From the monthly archives:

July 2007

Curing the Problem of Aging

by Rick on July 29, 2007

Found via Healthbolt.net: Aubrey de Grey, a Cambridge University geneticist, has said, “The first person to live to be 1,000 years old is certainly alive today; indeed, he or she may be about to turn 60 … Whether they realize it or not, barring accidents and suicide, most people now 40 years or younger can expect to live for centuries.”

And as is to be expected, probably a majority of scientists dismiss de Grey’s claims, but there are others who support his research, if not necessarily the extremely optimistic claim of living a millennium.

Frankly, I have no idea if this is possible.

Biblically, I cannot deny the humans have been living shorter lifespans, on average. I personally doubt any of us will ever top Methuselah’s impressive 969 years. A great deal of people believe Genesis 6:3 limits mankind’s lifespan to 120 years, but I’m fairly certain (and I feel it is more obvious) that the Lord here speaks of mankind in general and that the 120 years was the time period between then and the Deluge.

Later, we see in Psalm 90:10 an observation about man’s lifespan being in the 70s to 80s range; however, that does not seem to be a regulative statement.

Perhaps the most pertinent verse is Hebrews 9:27, which tells us that it is appointed unto man once to die. In other words, death is not a natural thing — it is an appointed, certain thing. “Death has your number” indeed, but more likely it is the Lord, waiting for the preordained time to pull you from this earth into eternity.

I do not see longevity research ever threatening our appointments with death. There are far too many causes in this world for science to stop them all. Frankly, mankind is far too creative when it comes to killing each other — whether we Supersize our hearts into failure or we atomize our enemies with bigger, badder bombs.

What I did observe in the few comments on the Healthbolt post, however, is that people seem to think that with that much time, they would get bored. If I may, let me make a few observations about that:

  • If boredom is implicit in having a longer life, then I claim that as support for my belief that in secular worldviews, life is without purpose or value.
  • If boredom is implicit in having a longer life, then it seems an admission that our enjoyment of others’ company — whether spouse, friend, or family — is based solely on novelty rather than sincere & lasting love.

I hope no Christian would claim that. Indeed, to be given 1,000 years of life here on earth would be a tremendous boon to our faith — imagine having 1,000 years to share the gospel with countless millions (if not billions). Imagine the degree to which we’d come to understand the Scriptures if given hundreds of years to study them.

And imagine the tremendous encouragement it will be to your faith after hundreds of years of seeing “science falsely so called” fail repeatedly while the Scriptures and the Church still stand strong. We would truly be able to witness that it is the hand of God which builds the church, and not the feeble efforts of man.

Yet while all of that sounds so tremendous, I don’t expect that I’ll live to see even 100, regardless of what de Grey and others’ research may show. As I said, there are many other ways to die, and I expect mine will be health related.

I do find it quite ironic that the one cause of death so many seem to prefer (”I hope to go in my sleep — peacefully and without suffering”) will be the one cause which is cured!

And as an aside, imagine how crazed name addicts will get when they’re able to contemplate sib sets for families of 80+!

{ 1 comment }

It’s Not about the Church

by Rick on July 29, 2007

So why do non-church churches do all they can to appeal to the unchurched? Why do they expend tremendous time & money to entertain, uplift, and impress those who otherwise will not come?

Why do they do these things? According to Keith Whitfield, “It’s not about the church. It’s not about the Bible. … It is about hatred for God.” You’ll want to read part 1 and 2 to get the whole story.

Suffice it to say, if as a body of believers gathered together, the Lord & His Word are not magnified through the teaching of the Scriptures, it’s time to take a long hard look at why you’re assembling at all.

{ 0 comments }

Coming back from Dad’s house tonight, I was pleased to see that the phpBB Group has released phpBB 3.0.RC4, the fourth release candidate in the long awaited 3.0 line.

Now, I realize that not all of you administer the coolest Christian community online — truly, that prestigious spot belongs to me — but quite a few people are running phpBB message boards of some kind or another, and you’re encouraged to update if you’re using 3.0.RC3 or older. If you’re still using 2.0.x, you may still want to wait until 3.0.0’s gold release before upgrading. … You may still want to wait, but you’re missing out on a slew of great features and a gorgeous new style!

{ 0 comments }

Introducing RickBeckman.org

by Rick on July 27, 2007

Welcome to RickBeckman.org. I don’t know yet who I’m addressing. As of right now, a tiny handful (I’d say less than three) know this website even exists. Indeed, it doesn’t even have a name yet, let alone much of anything else.

I created RickBeckman.org with the hopes that I will be able to more fully express myself without tying my hands to one particular niche subject. I want a place where I can wax theological in one post and then review the latest box office diversions (err, movies) a few short hours later, all without my core audience wondering what the heck is wrong with me.

I’ve found that in the past I have tended to try too hard to post that which I think will attract hits. Even when I’ve had nothing to say, I recall staring at my screen for upwards of an hour, clicking around random news sites hoping to find some inspiration for a post. I’m ashamed of that, and I hope to not fall into the same trap here.

In other words, I’m posting whatever I please, not what I think the angry mobs are demanding. If you don’t care about it, why are you reading it? If you do care about it, I caution that you may not get a steady diet of it here. I may post a one-off about a subject and never touch on it again. And I may rattle on ad nauseum about something no one but I cares about.

Yeah, I’m such a rebel.

So, again, welcome to RickBeckman.org, soon to be the #1 source of information on the internet for all things, well, Rick Beckman and the things which make him tick (and tock).

{ 0 comments }