Cloverfield

by Rick Beckman on January 19, 02008

Frantic action in “Cloverfield”

Sev­eral months have I antic­i­pated Clover­field; even while it was known only by its release date 01-18-2008, I was hyped up over the movie. Actu­ally, I remem­ber dis­tinctly spec­u­lat­ing about the movie based upon the ear­li­est teasers; was it a Godzilla remake? a Voltron movie? or some­thing else entirely?

And some­thing else entirely is exactly what this film deliv­ered. I can­not say that the film was sub­stan­tially more than what was shown in the pre­views because it wasn’t; I give the film­mak­ers kudos for giv­ing exactly what was promised within the trail­ers — noth­ing more, noth­ing less.

We are thrown into the world some New York friends ((No, not those Friends.)) throw­ing a good­bye party for Rob who is to be leav­ing for Japan to take a job. One of these friends, Hud, ((I’m unsure if “Hud” is a play off of HUD or not, but as the cam­era­man for the bulk of the film, it would cer­tainly fit.)) is given the job of doc­u­ment­ing the night so that Rob would be able to relive those moments with his friends any­time with the ease of press­ing play.

These intro­duc­tory moments of the film serve not only to intro­duce us to the char­ac­ters and the uncer­tain rela­tion­ship sta­tus of Rob and Beth, but it also gives us a chance to accli­mate our­selves to the film’s style — when I say that the film was recorded on a hand-held cam­era, I mean that and every­thing that goes along with it — the camera’s view shakes, spins around, and cuts in odd places as the film’s char­ac­ters oper­ate the device.

This may make some peo­ple nau­se­ated, but I do not hold that against the film. Rather, the style worked and deliv­ered a sense of urgency, sus­pense, and real­ness through­out the movie which oth­er­wise would not have been there.

The stars of “Cloverfield”

Now be care­ful: Clover­field doesn’t try to win you over with super­star act­ing or art­ful direct­ing; it is a no-holds-barred look into the per­spec­tive of a few twenty-somethings who hap­pen to be in Man­hat­tan on the wrong night. We are right there with them, along for the ride of their lives.

I’ve heard the style of the movie com­pared to that of a first-person video game, except instead of car­ry­ing around a vast array of high tech weaponry, we’re armed to the teeth with a video cam­era. I really like this com­par­i­son because it is easy for me to iden­tify with the char­ac­ter I am sup­posed to be in first-person games ((In that regard, I’ve been James Bond more often than any Hol­ly­wood actor, ever.)), and just as that draws you deeper into the plot of the game, so to does the first-person per­spec­tive bring us deeper into the movie.

Is the plot deep enough to immerse your­self into? It’s by no means an ocean, but it doesn’t pre­tend to be. There’s a mod­est love story, a freak­ing huge mon­ster attack­ing a city which freak­ing huge mon­sters seem attracted to, ((Case in point: The Stay-Puft Marsh­mal­low Man.)) lots of explo­sions, even more screams, and ginor­mous par­a­sites. ((It’s okay; lice is nice.))

Lady Liberty decapitated in “Cloverfield”

Clover­field kept me excited through­out its ninety-minute run time. The actors did a great job of por­tray­ing ordi­nary peo­ple in an extra­or­di­nary cir­cum­stance; they did such a good job, in fact, that no sin­gle per­for­mance seemed to out­shine any of the oth­ers. The char­ac­ters seemed real, and we get to know noth­ing more about them save for what you would ordi­nar­ily get out of some­one within just over an hours’ time while flee­ing cer­tain death at the hands of a mon­ster that makes Godzilla look like Yoshi.

Yoshi

Stop read­ing now if you do not wish cer­tain aspects of the movie to be spoiled. If you stop read­ing here, then suf­fice it to say that I highly rec­om­mend Clover­field to any­one look­ing for ninety-minutes of excit­ing, edge-of-your-seat movie.

And a mon­strous men­ace it was, so much so that there is some spec­u­la­tion that a bit of whis­pered dia­logue at the end of the cred­its states that the crea­ture is still alive — after hav­ing had nuclear weaponry used against it. Tra­di­tional weaponry — from bul­lets to a vari­ety of explo­sives — seemed to have no effect what­so­ever on the crea­ture, and so one is left won­der­ing what it is… Is it a crea­ture of old Earth, as the Bal­rog was to Mid­dle Earth? Is it a god akin to those in Lovecraft’s lore? ((Two ref­er­ences to lit­er­a­ture I have not read in a row; I really need to read more so I can feel bet­ter about some of these com­par­isons.)) What could be so invincible?

We are not told, nor are we pre­sented with any hope that the crea­ture can be stopped. With­out any Kryp­to­ni­ans, Ultra­zords, or Head & Shoul­ders in sight, we can only won­der how the tide is even­tu­ally turned.

What is obvi­ous is that at some point, the after­math of Man­hat­tan is able to be explored and the mem­ory card from Rob’s cam­era is recov­ered. Cen­tral Park at that point is code­named “Clover­field,” and (mostly) Hud’s footage details the inci­dent. Does the fight against the crea­tures con­tinue on? We are not told.

And that kind of uncer­tain end­ing worked really well with this film, which I highly rec­om­mend to any­one look­ing for an excit­ing movie.

{ 5 voices in the conversation. Speak up! }

Smumdax January 24, 2008 at 07:08

First comment on your newly revamped website, Rick!
I did not see Cloverfield (yet). I did download the CAM version that hit the torrent world a couple days ago. However, after watching 10-15 minutes of it, I realized that I was watching a handheld camera filming of another handheld camera film… I wasn’t ever sure if those people crossing the screen were actually in the movie instead of in the movie thater…

And so I will go see this movie in theaters in a coupe days. It will be worth it, I’m sure.

Smumdax January 24, 2008 at 07:15

…just testing the gravatar thing.

Rick Beckman January 24, 2008 at 14:22

Smumdax — You’ll enjoy the movie! Also, if you did sign up for a gravatar, it isn’t showing up here yet. I refreshed the local cache, and it still didn’t pull a gravatar down from their server for you.

Jami January 24, 2008 at 14:56

Rick, Great review by the way. I like how you summarized things. It seems that people either love this movie or hate it. I’m on the loving end probably due my anticipation of it and like of Abrams directing style.

Good to see that you have imagination too and didn’t want nor expected to have a movie hand-feed you every little thing you should think about it. :)

Cheers,
Jami

Oh, I found you through Chris P.’s site on his themes. Checking into using one of them. Nice site you’ve got here.

Rick Beckman January 24, 2008 at 23:44

Jami — Oh my… I just went over to check out your site when I initially saw your comment, and it didn’t even occur to me that you’re using the same theme which I’m using here! I think that confirms it… My powers of observation are nonexistent. :)

Thanks for the comment and glad you enjoyed the movie. Hollywood needs more films like this — that don’t shy away from trying something stylistically new, while not hand-holding the audience through every plot development.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: