Now CommentLuv Enabled

by Rick Beckman on March 4, 02008

Flamingo Love

In order to give some­thing back to those who take the time to leave com­ments here, I’ve installed the bril­liant lit­tle plu­gin Com­mentLuv.

What does this mean for you? Well, unless you are a blog­ger or have some other web­site which pro­duces a syn­di­ca­tion feed, noth­ing (sorry).

How­ever, if you are the proud owner of a site (such as a blog) which makes avail­able your lat­est posts via a syn­di­ca­tion feed, then you will gain a com­pletely free deep link ((A link to an indi­vid­ual page of your site, rather than sim­ply to your home page.)) to your site!

The Com­mentLuv plu­gin will do its best to auto-discover your feed based upon the address sub­mit­ted in the form while com­ment­ing; how­ever, if you want to ensure that your feed is dis­cov­ered, you can include it man­u­ally within your com­ment. Example:

This is an exam­ple com­ment. It will con­tain qual­ity feed­back and not lame “First post!” non­sense or other rub­bish. ((Why will it be a qual­ity com­ment? Because my read­ers rock, that’s why!)) And so on. And so on. But I also want to make sure Com­mentLuv can find my feed, so I’m going to add this to my com­ment: [feed]http://www.example.com/feed/[/feed]

That’s it! The magic is in the [feed] tag; sim­ply enclose the address to your feed in those tags, and Com­mentLuv will attempt to dis­cover your lat­est entry based upon it.

And if all goes well, your com­ment will be posted, with the added bonus of includ­ing a nice, shiny link back to a page on your site. Delight­ful, no?

I still reserve the right to delete com­ments if they look sus­pi­ciously spammy. Hav­ing a huge num­ber of com­ments means noth­ing to me if the qual­ity of the com­ments is poor — and I cer­tainly don’t want to risk being flagged by Google because of spam-ish com­ments. So, just use your head when you com­ment, and you’ll be fine.

And enjoy the extra back­links to your site! :-)

(And if you want to see Com­mentLuv in action, the first reader to ben­e­fit from it was Gor­dan com­ment­ing on my Gen­e­sis 1:4 post!)

{ 5 voices in the conversation. Speak up! }

Brandon March 5, 2008 at 14:16

Why will it be a quality comment? Because my readers rock, that’s why!
Go on. Deny every vice of human laziness, ignore that it’s coupled with the Internet. Continue to believe in the ability of your readers to produce intelligent comments. :P

Umm. Do these back-links produce a link to a relevant page on the site? Or just ‘latest from?’. Will enclosing a link to a relevant page on our site in the feed tags produce the same thing? Or does that become spam?

Michael March 5, 2008 at 15:19

Hi Rick,

Michael from Germany here.

Thums up. I simply love CommentLuv ..*-)

Oh, and great theme …*-)

I use it myself on two blogs. On one i replace the rotating headers with a video wall.

For the other one i still look for some photos or pics with the right size to use. Where did you find yours? They look real nice

Keep the good work up …*-)

Michael

Latest from Michael: Full or Partial Feeds? Or Headlines only?

Rick Beckman March 5, 2008 at 22:07

Michael — Thanks for stopping by Kingdom Front! To answer your question, I’m using cropped portions of wallpapers made by the incomparable Vladstudio, with his permission.

Also, I should point out that you are using FeedBurner’s link tracking tool (or click tracking or whatever it is); the link to your content that CommentLuv see is a FeedBurner redirect link — users clicking the link will arrive at your content, but search engines may very well credit the link to FeedBurner rather than to your content. For more info, check out “Turn off FeedBurner Redirects in RSS Feeds from shankri-la.

Brandon — My readers (at least the ones I can rule out as being scripted bots) haven’t let me down yet. ;-)

CommentLuv only returns a link to the latest post on a site — see the previous comment by Michael, for example. The [feed] tags will only work with links to an RSS feed. That, of course, means that if only one category of a blog is relevant to this site, you could include that category’s feed, for example [feed]http://example.com/category/theology/feed/[/feed].

I suppose it is possible that if a post fills up with dozens or hundreds of comments (’cause that happens so often around here!), the variety of likely irrelevant links may dilute the authority of this page in search engines… but, I’m not terribly worried about such things, and the benefit to my readers outweighs any consequences on my part.

Brandon March 6, 2008 at 02:33

I see. That is really quite cool, and actually rather generous and self-sacrificing as well. /me applauds. Now to try this again… maybe this time I will get it right. :P Do I actually have to type in ‘latest from me’ when using the feed tags or is that provided by CommentLuv?

Latest from Brandon: Overcoming: The Craving

King Vanlines March 17, 2008 at 15:59

Thanks for writing your review on commentluv. this looks like a really cool tool!

Latest from King Vanlines: Picking a Washington Moving Company

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: