Goodbye, “Lost”

by Rick Beckman on May 24, 02010

Last modified on May 24, 02010

Last night was the much antic­i­pated, much hyped “Lost” finale. I’ve counted myself a fan of the show for some­thing around a year now, and I’ve seen just about every episode (minus around four which I slept through).

With the series wrapped up, undoubt­edly many the­o­ries regard­ing just what on Earth (if they were even on Earth ;) was going on with Jack, Kate, Sawyer, and their rag­tag band of merry men. Pre­vi­ous to last night’s finale, the writ­ers of “Lost” said in a ret­ro­spec­tive spe­cial that they wanted to make a show that chal­lenged view­ers to think and forced them to engage with the events of the show because every­thing wouldn’t sim­ply be handed to them.

I’m glad they said that. They want us to think about what has hap­pened, and with the finale out there now, I want to offer up a few thoughts. Stop read­ing now if you do not want any spoil­ers. They start now…

So the finale fin­ished up, and as it turns out, for the past sea­son, the “flash side­ways” which we have been see­ing haven’t been an alter­nate real­ity or a dif­fer­ent dimen­sion at all… it has been some sort of after­life. Not Heaven, not Hell, not even Pur­ga­tory, but an after­life formed appar­ently by the group con­scious­ness of the sur­vivors of the plane wreck… and a few oth­ers who weren’t on the plane but got to take part anyway.

What does that mean? It means that for the entire last sea­son, about half of the show has been point­less — the events were already set & done, and we were sim­ply wait­ing for the big reveal that “Oh, hey, guys, wel­come to the church. By the way, you’re dead.”

And I’d per­haps be okay with that if in so reveal­ing that real­ity they bet­ter explained the other half of this past sea­son (the events tak­ing place on the island), but that didn’t hap­pen. Instead, the “we’re all dead” real­iza­tion seemed way too con­trived and served as a mech­a­nism sim­ply for get­ting all of the prin­ci­pal cast together for an emo­tional reunion. Cou­ples reunited. Char­ac­ters we haven’t seen in ages are back. And so on.

But where were Michael & Walt? Where was Mr. Eko? What about Ethan? I don’t recall Richard or Lapidus being present either, and while I don’t recall Miles being at the church, he was at least present in the after­life as Sawyer’s partner.

The argu­ment that the church scene was only for sur­vivors of the Oceanic crash doesn’t work either. Juliet, Desmond, and oth­ers being present there throws that the­ory out of whack.

And how did Hur­ley die? Last time we see him on the island, he was endowed with the duty to pro­tect the island, pre­sum­ably as an immor­tal (or as “immor­tal” as Jacob was, at least). The man in black died & Jack was mor­tally wounded while the “light” was out; Hur­ley, how­ever, sur­vived that whole ordeal and should have been able to live indef­i­nitely until some killed him or the “light” was once again uncorked.

But Hur­ley was present in the after­life. So how did he die? Why is there now a pre­sum­ably large part of island his­tory that we aren’t privy to, despite it involv­ing one of our main characters?

Or per­haps the atom bomb explo­sion at the end of last sea­son killed every­one. Per­haps the island scenes of this past sea­son were the true “flash side­ways” scenes and that the after­life scenes were the only part that was “real.”

Then again, per­haps every­one died after Locke pre­vented the num­bers from being entered into the hatch com­puter years ago. Per­haps Desmond’s acti­va­tion of the fail­safe device killed every­one. It seems as though imme­di­ately after that, Desmond started get­ting weird flashes of mem­ory or knowl­edge he shouldn’t oth­er­wise have… which is about what hap­pened to every­one else in the final sea­son. Per­haps Desmond’s unique phys­i­ol­ogy (resis­tance to elec­tro­mag­netic radi­a­tion, for exam­ple) some­how let him to bet­ter real­ize their sit­u­a­tion, years ahead of every­one else.

And if not, then I must have missed the expla­na­tion for how Desmond wound up naked in the woods with pre­scient knowl­edge of var­i­ous cir­cum­stances. What­ever the case here, I’m pretty cer­tain that the entire series was actu­ally about Desmond. Every­one else just hap­pened to get involved inci­den­tally. Even the all impor­tant Jacob didn’t really seem to do any­thing than to pro­vide impor­tant expo­si­tion at var­i­ous points.

But every­one, includ­ing Jacob, was already dead accord­ing to my Desmond the­ory, so Jacob really didn’t pro­vide any­thing that ulti­mately amounted to a hill of beans… Jack’s father’s expo­si­tion at the close of the series pro­vided a big­ger bomb­shell than Jacob ever spoke of.

Frankly, I was hop­ing that once we real­ized that the cof­fin was empty, the cam­era would pan around to see Jack’s father who was, like Locke pre­vi­ously, now the smoke mon­ster. Now that would have made for an inter­est­ing ending.

As it is, the series ended with a two and a half hour long episode that wasn’t really any dif­fer­ent from any other episode in the last sea­son. The only rea­son the episode was so long any­way was to cram in as many “we got our mem­ory back” moments as pos­si­ble — ulti­mately turn­ing the episode into one of those emo­tional flash­back episodes that so many series end on. (Thank good­ness that the “Star Trek” writ­ers of the var­i­ous series actu­ally ended series with strongly writ­ten, inter­est­ing episodes that didn’t use the flash­back cop-out!)

And I think that’s what bugs me most about last night’s finale. A show that has con­stantly chal­lenged its view­ers to think, to sec­ond guess what we see on screen, ends with an emo­tional char­ac­ter reunion that ignores pretty much every ques­tion which the show has asked and failed to answer.

Even the cli­max of the episode — the final con­fronta­tion between Jack & Locke — felt hol­low and dis­ap­point­ing. While there was enough drama in the scene to feel like a cli­mac­tic scene, that drama paled in com­par­i­son to, for exam­ple, the atom bomb scene between Sawyer, Juliet, and Jack. Then the episode dragged on for another forty-five min­utes, fur­ther into answer-free char­ac­ter reunion ter­ri­tory. Only now there was noth­ing to drive the remain­der of the plot, no more chal­lenge, no more con­flict. (Unless you count the chal­lenge of pro­vid­ing much needed expo­si­tion or rev­e­la­tion, but the writ­ers didn’t seem to want to touch that much last night.)

I seem to recall an inter­view or sound­byte wherein the writ­ers said that every time they heard a fan the­ory regard­ing what was going on, they inten­tion­ally tried to not use it. Peo­ple have been the­o­riz­ing that every­one was dead since sea­son one. Turns out they were right.

Too bad.

I will say I was glad to see that Vin­cent the dog didn’t show up in the “after­life,” thereby avoid­ing a pet peeve of mine!

{ 6 voices in the conversation. Speak up! }

Craig May 24, 2010 at 09:22

Very good, my thoughts exactly.

Senior May 24, 2010 at 09:29

http://www.thedoghousediaries.com/?p=1790

Don’t miss the mouse over text.

Rick Beckman May 24, 2010 at 09:58

I love DOGHOUSE, but I think that punchline is more appropriate to the movie Memento than to Lost.

Alicia May 24, 2010 at 10:32

I, to some extent, liked the reunion toward the end. I liked that Sun and Jin were together, Hurley and Libby, Sayid and Shannon, Sawyer and Juliet. But, I wasn’t such a big fan of the fact that they were all reunited only for a “hey we’re dead and gonna fade away into white light.”

Up until the “we’re all dead” reveal, I had the thought that Hurley, being the new protector found a loophole for how they could all leave the island and live happily ever after, by transferring the consciousness of the island characters to their counterparts in this alternate reality/dimension. There Sun and Jin could enjoy their pregnancy and baby, Claire and Charlie could be together and raise Aaron….That would be a happier ending, though perhaps not as “thoughtworthy.”

I also kind of like the theory that they all actually died with the bomb or when the numbers failed (perhaps, dare I say, even at the initial plane crash). I will admit that was an initial thought I had upon first watching, and that the island itself was a kind of purgatory, That, to me, explained why the previously dead were walking around. I think that was a common early thought.

Colin May 24, 2010 at 11:06

Alright alright. I’ll put my two cents in since you OBVIOUSLY asked for it.

“But where were Michael & Walt? Where was Mr. Eko? What about Ethan? I don’t recall Richard or Lapidus being present either, and while I don’t recall Miles being at the church, he was at least present in the after life as Sawyer’s partner.”

Michael, Mr. Eko and Ethan were probably not in there because the actors couldn’t actually make it. The actor who plays Walt was 12 when the series started. He’s now 18. Since nobody seemed to age after they died even though some of them (presumably) died of old age, they couldn’t exactly put him in the last scene since it’d be awkward.

As for Frank, Miles and Richard (and you forgot Charlotte and Daniel) none of them had their own flashbacks or flashforwards from seasons 1-5. We haven’t exactly invested our lives into them as much as we had everybody else…including Juliet, Ben and Desmond.

“And how did Hurley die? Last time we see him on the island, he was endowed with the duty to pro tect the island, pre sum ably as an immortal (or as “immortal” as Jacob was, at least).”

You said it yourself. He’s as immortal as Jacob was. And Jacob’s died too. Besides, there’s nothing to say that someone didn’t come to the island that Hurley didn’t eventually pass the job to. But I do agree that I would have liked to have seen more than this.

As for everything else, they weren’t dead the entire show. (though that was a theory of mine for a while) They were only dead at the end and only in the “alternate universe” or flash sideways (can we call them “dead flashes” now?). If Desmond had killed them all back when he turned the failsafe then the rest of the series has no point. And no matter how much you feel season 6′s dead flashes were a copout, I have to believe that the writers weren’t writing for absolutely no purpose to tell a story that didn’t really happen for 3 seasons.

I mean something like that happened in one episode in House and that’s about all I could handle.

Rick Beckman May 24, 2010 at 11:54

It’s funny you mentioned that the rest of the series wouldn’t have mattered because that’s kinda how I feel the non-flashes of the final season were. They didn’t matter. They resolved nothing. They served to only keep us invested in the island even though the grand conclusion of things wouldn’t be there but instead in the flashes… which didn’t really resolve anything other than pointing out the obvious (they all died, whether during the series or “eventually”). Not really profound — certainly not as profound as some of the other plot points!

As for Richard, he may not have had flashbacks or forwards in previous seasons, but he had an entire episode this season and has been along since the beginning just about. I liked him as a character more than probably 90% of the survivors, and I don’t buy that I’m the only one to feel invested in that character. :D

As for using the “we weren’t invested in them” excuse as to why they weren’t there at the end… well, there were plenty of people there who I didn’t really feel invested in. Besides, are we to believe that the Lost afterlife determines who shows up based upon the investment in folks’ lives by people in an alternate, higher reality (ours)? If Lost wants to have a grand reunion with everyone, then there needs to be some story element which explains why there are notable characters missing. Otherwise, the conclusion comes across as poorly thought out and incomplete.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: