<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Rick Beckman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rickbeckman.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rickbeckman.org</link>
	<description>That Atheist Dick</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 17:01:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Line of Cain by Donna</title>
		<link>http://rickbeckman.org/blog/2009/01/06/the-line-of-cain/#comment-28426</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 17:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disciple.rickbeckman.com/?p=13#comment-28426</guid>
		<description>Can someone tell me why Abel is not listed in Adam&#039;s family tree?
Is it possible that Adam was not his father?
Could Abel be a kind of/ or Jesus in an earlier visitation to earth?
Also, is it possible that Adam was the devil?
or at least had the devil indwelling him? After all he was willing to let Eve die by eating the apple, (he did not tell her that she would die and then grab it away from her). He was content to let her eat it and see what happened.
I don&#039;t mean to offend anyone but I want to be sure I know the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone tell me why Abel is not listed in Adam’s family tree?<br />
Is it possible that Adam was not his father?<br />
Could Abel be a kind of/ or Jesus in an earlier visitation to earth?<br />
Also, is it possible that Adam was the devil?<br />
or at least had the devil indwelling him? After all he was willing to let Eve die by eating the apple, (he did not tell her that she would die and then grab it away from her). He was content to let her eat it and see what happened.<br />
I don’t mean to offend anyone but I want to be sure I know the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Do Godly Men Act Happier Than the Non-Religious? by Michael Wong</title>
		<link>http://rickbeckman.org/blog/2011/10/24/do-godly-men-act-happier-than-the-non-religious/#comment-28363</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Wong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 07:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickbeckman.org/?p=2185#comment-28363</guid>
		<description>Hi, Rick!  It&#039;s been a few years since our phpBB debates, and I was curious to see the new atheist version of you.  I have to say that I prefer the new you over the old Bible thumping version :)

As for the actual content of this post, I have some ideas to offer:

1) Regarding death, Christianity does offer hope. But what&#039;s the difference between the false joy of the &quot;ecstasy&quot; drug and the false hope of an imaginary afterlife? Is it not better to accept that the universe is capable of getting along just fine after we&#039;re gone?

2) Christianity does offer absolution of guilt.  But is it real absolution?  Christianity says &quot;you are utterly irredeemable, but I forgive you anyway&quot;.  Is that really as good as the kind of absolution you get when you actually make up for the bad things you&#039;ve done?  Frankly, I think the absolution offered by Christianity is not even remotely satisfying, and that Christians in fact feel perpetually inadequate, because they&#039;re always comparing themselves to an idealized super-altruist. In many ways, Christians are taught to despise their own humanity.

3) Christian fellowship can make some people very happy. But it can also make some people very unhappy. The flip-side of a tight-knit community is that if you&#039;re on the outs with that community, you have nowhere to turn. It feels like the whole world is against you. So there is a powerful pressure to conform, agree with everyone else, do what they say, etc. Consider how the evangelical community in the 1970s was overwhelmingly liberal, and supported programs for the poor. And today, that SAME community has almost entirely shifted to right-wing politics, hating welfare, discouraging immigration, etc. How can millions of people all change their minds at the same time, in the same way? The answer is simple: the &quot;fellowship&quot; of the Christian community is NOT free; it comes with a price tag, and the price tag is conformity.

Let me just leave with one final thought: if Christians are so happy, why do so many of them rant so angrily about &quot;family values&quot;? And let&#039;s face it, the way they use it, &quot;family values&quot; is a wonderfully clever term for &quot;let&#039;s manufacture an excuse to treat certain people like crap even if they&#039;ve never hurt anyone&quot;. Any group which tries so hard to harm the interests of other people can&#039;t be considered collectively &quot;happy&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Rick!  It’s been a few years since our phpBB debates, and I was curious to see the new atheist version of you.  I have to say that I prefer the new you over the old Bible thumping version :)</p>
<p>As for the actual content of this post, I have some ideas to offer:</p>
<p>1) Regarding death, Christianity does offer hope. But what’s the difference between the false joy of the “ecstasy” drug and the false hope of an imaginary afterlife? Is it not better to accept that the universe is capable of getting along just fine after we’re gone?</p>
<p>2) Christianity does offer absolution of guilt.  But is it real absolution?  Christianity says “you are utterly irredeemable, but I forgive you anyway”.  Is that really as good as the kind of absolution you get when you actually make up for the bad things you’ve done?  Frankly, I think the absolution offered by Christianity is not even remotely satisfying, and that Christians in fact feel perpetually inadequate, because they’re always comparing themselves to an idealized super-altruist. In many ways, Christians are taught to despise their own humanity.</p>
<p>3) Christian fellowship can make some people very happy. But it can also make some people very unhappy. The flip-side of a tight-knit community is that if you’re on the outs with that community, you have nowhere to turn. It feels like the whole world is against you. So there is a powerful pressure to conform, agree with everyone else, do what they say, etc. Consider how the evangelical community in the 1970s was overwhelmingly liberal, and supported programs for the poor. And today, that SAME community has almost entirely shifted to right-wing politics, hating welfare, discouraging immigration, etc. How can millions of people all change their minds at the same time, in the same way? The answer is simple: the “fellowship” of the Christian community is NOT free; it comes with a price tag, and the price tag is conformity.</p>
<p>Let me just leave with one final thought: if Christians are so happy, why do so many of them rant so angrily about “family values”? And let’s face it, the way they use it, “family values” is a wonderfully clever term for “let’s manufacture an excuse to treat certain people like crap even if they’ve never hurt anyone”. Any group which tries so hard to harm the interests of other people can’t be considered collectively “happy”.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What to Expect from Thesis 2.0 by Harsh Agrawal</title>
		<link>http://rickbeckman.org/blog/2011/09/02/what-to-expect-from-thesis-2-0/#comment-28291</link>
		<dc:creator>Harsh Agrawal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 19:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickbeckman.org/?p=2082#comment-28291</guid>
		<description>Honestly I&#039;m getting tired of Thesis team...They have been delaying the launch from ages....Seems like it&#039;s time to pick another framework..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly I’m getting tired of Thesis team…They have been delaying the launch from ages.…Seems like it’s time to pick another framework..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Do Godly Men Act Happier Than the Non-Religious? by iaintjudginnobodyconfusedjusttrynakeepmyheadup</title>
		<link>http://rickbeckman.org/blog/2011/10/24/do-godly-men-act-happier-than-the-non-religious/#comment-28210</link>
		<dc:creator>iaintjudginnobodyconfusedjusttrynakeepmyheadup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 02:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickbeckman.org/?p=2185#comment-28210</guid>
		<description>yeah rick what it do? you seemed so gung ho on the jesus train now YOU the pilot drivin in anotha lane..... some might say the broader lane...... that we&#039;re taught leads to eternal pain......what gives ? u no longer believe He lives? how u went from marchin on the proper route to satan pimpin and turnin you out???? i can relate let me make that clear.....done fell for that brimstone breath game in my ear....as for moi i thought i was blind and could see....but the more i saw the less God made sense to me.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah rick what it do? you seemed so gung ho on the jesus train now YOU the pilot drivin in anotha lane.…. some might say the broader lane.….. that we’re taught leads to eternal pain.…..what gives ? u no longer believe He lives? how u went from marchin on the proper route to satan pimpin and turnin you out???? i can relate let me make that clear.….done fell for that brimstone breath game in my ear.…as for moi i thought i was blind and could see.…but the more i saw the less God made sense to me.….</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on KJV 1611 vs. KJV 1769 by Will Kinney</title>
		<link>http://rickbeckman.org/blog/2007/03/24/kjv-1611-vs-kjv-1769/#comment-27689</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Kinney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 10:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timothysburden.com/2007/03/24/kjv-1611-vs-kjv-1769/#comment-27689</guid>
		<description>Undeniable Proof the ESV, NIV, NASB, NET etc. are  the new &quot;Catholic&quot; bibles

“Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins” Revelation 18:4


http://brandplucked.webs.com/realcatholicbibles.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Undeniable Proof the ESV, NIV, NASB, NET etc. are  the new “Catholic” bibles</p>
<p>“Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins” Revelation 18:4</p>
<p><a href="http://brandplucked.webs.com/realcatholicbibles.htm" rel="nofollow">http://brandplucked.webs.com/realcatholicbibles.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on KJV 1611 vs. KJV 1769 by Will Kinney</title>
		<link>http://rickbeckman.org/blog/2007/03/24/kjv-1611-vs-kjv-1769/#comment-27688</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Kinney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 10:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timothysburden.com/2007/03/24/kjv-1611-vs-kjv-1769/#comment-27688</guid>
		<description>As for the comments about Easter, the King James Bible is right, as always -

http://brandplucked.webs.com/easterreplenish.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for the comments about Easter, the King James Bible is right, as always -</p>
<p><a href="http://brandplucked.webs.com/easterreplenish.htm" rel="nofollow">http://brandplucked.webs.com/easterreplenish.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on KJV 1611 vs. KJV 1769 by Will Kinney</title>
		<link>http://rickbeckman.org/blog/2007/03/24/kjv-1611-vs-kjv-1769/#comment-27687</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Kinney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 10:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timothysburden.com/2007/03/24/kjv-1611-vs-kjv-1769/#comment-27687</guid>
		<description>Bible agnostic says: &quot;I have heard this enough in vary­ing places that I wanted to post this just to help oth­ers not be duped by the state­ment: “The only changes made since the 1611 trans­la­tion of the KJV until now have been changes of spelling or print­ing only.”

That state­ment is a lie, and peo­ple who love Jesus &amp; the Bible should not make such a claim — even if they do have the best of inten­tions in doing so!&quot;

Well, what about the American Bible Society statement?
Even the American Bible Society, no friend to the King James Bible, had this to say about the &quot;revisions&quot; of the King James Bible. The American Bible Society wrote, &quot;The English Bible, as left by the translators (of 1611), has come down to us unaltered in respect to its text...&quot; They further stated, &quot;With the exception of typographical errors and changes required by the progress of orthography in the English language, the text of our present Bibles remains unchanged, and without variation from the original copy as left by the translators&quot; (Committee on Versions to the Board of Managers, American Bible Society, 1852).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bible agnostic says: “I have heard this enough in vary­ing places that I wanted to post this just to help oth­ers not be duped by the state­ment: “The only changes made since the 1611 trans­la­tion of the KJV until now have been changes of spelling or print­ing only.”</p>
<p>That state­ment is a lie, and peo­ple who love Jesus &amp; the Bible should not make such a claim — even if they do have the best of inten­tions in doing so!”</p>
<p>Well, what about the American Bible Society statement?<br />
Even the American Bible Society, no friend to the King James Bible, had this to say about the “revisions” of the King James Bible. The American Bible Society wrote, “The English Bible, as left by the translators (of 1611), has come down to us unaltered in respect to its text…” They further stated, “With the exception of typographical errors and changes required by the progress of orthography in the English language, the text of our present Bibles remains unchanged, and without variation from the original copy as left by the translators” (Committee on Versions to the Board of Managers, American Bible Society, 1852).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Do Godly Men Act Happier Than the Non-Religious? by Bill Uhrich</title>
		<link>http://rickbeckman.org/blog/2011/10/24/do-godly-men-act-happier-than-the-non-religious/#comment-27500</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Uhrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 20:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickbeckman.org/?p=2185#comment-27500</guid>
		<description>Rick,

I found your blog again after several years and see with some surprise that you are an atheist.

Did you write a specific blog entry about the tipping point away that occurred in favor of atheism?  I&#039;d like to read about that journey.

Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick,</p>
<p>I found your blog again after several years and see with some surprise that you are an atheist.</p>
<p>Did you write a specific blog entry about the tipping point away that occurred in favor of atheism?  I’d like to read about that journey.</p>
<p>Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on KJV 1611 vs. KJV 1769 by Will Kinney</title>
		<link>http://rickbeckman.org/blog/2007/03/24/kjv-1611-vs-kjv-1769/#comment-27316</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Kinney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 10:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timothysburden.com/2007/03/24/kjv-1611-vs-kjv-1769/#comment-27316</guid>
		<description>I have seen this list many times and to me it is just plain obvious that they are nothing more than printing errors that were soon caught and corrected.  But the bible agnostics and Bible critics will hang on to this excuse and pretext for dear life.  It is the ONLY thing they still have going for them in an effort to &quot;prove&quot; that no Bible in any language is or ever was the complete and infallible words of God.  Not one of these people has anything in the way of a complete and 100% true Bible in any language to give us in the place of the King James Bible, and they know it. They stubbornly and pridefully refuse to submit to God&#039;s final written authority and sovereignty in history in giving us the King James Bible as His Final Authority of Written Truth.  I run into these guys on the internet all the time. They have run out of arguments and examples of alleged &quot;errors&quot; in the Book, so this is their last ditch effort to hang on to their Biblical agnosticism. 

See &#039;The Printing Errors Ploy&#039;
http://brandplucked.webs.com/printingerrors.htm

Will Kinney</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen this list many times and to me it is just plain obvious that they are nothing more than printing errors that were soon caught and corrected.  But the bible agnostics and Bible critics will hang on to this excuse and pretext for dear life.  It is the ONLY thing they still have going for them in an effort to “prove” that no Bible in any language is or ever was the complete and infallible words of God.  Not one of these people has anything in the way of a complete and 100% true Bible in any language to give us in the place of the King James Bible, and they know it. They stubbornly and pridefully refuse to submit to God’s final written authority and sovereignty in history in giving us the King James Bible as His Final Authority of Written Truth.  I run into these guys on the internet all the time. They have run out of arguments and examples of alleged “errors” in the Book, so this is their last ditch effort to hang on to their Biblical agnosticism. </p>
<p>See ‘The Printing Errors Ploy’<br />
<a href="http://brandplucked.webs.com/printingerrors.htm" rel="nofollow">http://brandplucked.webs.com/printingerrors.htm</a></p>
<p>Will Kinney</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thesis OpenHook by Mike</title>
		<link>http://rickbeckman.org/thesis-openhook/#comment-26794</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 04:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickbeckman.org/#comment-26794</guid>
		<description>Hi, this is a great plugin and I use it often. I have a few wishlist items that may save developers lots of time and make this plugin even more awesome.

1) When clicking a save button the page should return to the hook that was updated. Perhaps an ajax update? I often edit the same hook many times before getting it right, and if I could avoid scrolling back to the hook after updating it, it would save LOTS of time.

2) Remembering the text area size. Some of my hooks have 50+ lines of html. I can resize the textarea, but after hitting save it will return back to the default size. If openhook could remember the size, it would be great.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, this is a great plugin and I use it often. I have a few wishlist items that may save developers lots of time and make this plugin even more awesome.</p>
<p>1) When clicking a save button the page should return to the hook that was updated. Perhaps an ajax update? I often edit the same hook many times before getting it right, and if I could avoid scrolling back to the hook after updating it, it would save LOTS of time.</p>
<p>2) Remembering the text area size. Some of my hooks have 50+ lines of html. I can resize the textarea, but after hitting save it will return back to the default size. If openhook could remember the size, it would be great.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.329 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-03 21:56:29 -->

