Is Satan the One Called “Lucifer”?

Then I saw an angel com­ing down from heaven, hold­ing in his hand the key to the bot­tom­less pit and a great chain. ²And he seized the dragon, that ancient ser­pent, who is the devil and Satan, and bound him for a thou­sand years, ³and threw him into the pit, and shut it and sealed it over him, so that he might not deceive the nations any longer, until the thou­sand years were ended. After that he must be released for a lit­tle while. The Revelation of Jesus Christ 20:1 – 3

Some of Satan’s most impres­sive lies are lies about his own nature. I’ve heard this attrib­uted to var­i­ous peo­ple, that the great­est trick or lie of Satan is that he has con­vinced the world that he does not exist.

Honestly, I think that if you dis­be­lieve in Satan, you have far worse things to worry about than that, par­tic­u­larly your trust of God’s Word.

Far worse, I think, is believ­ing that Satan exists but grossly mis­un­der­stand­ing his nature. For instance, there is the lie that Satan was once a mag­nif­i­cent angel named Lucifer who led a great revolt in Heaven, caus­ing a great many angels to fall from glory with him. I call that a lie know­ing full well it is the major­ity view among Christians, although minor details may very from church to church and indi­vid­ual to individual.

When you start with a lie, though, it’s very dif­fi­cult to ever built to a point where truth is able to be seen, appre­ci­ated, and even loved. The base lies cor­rupt every­thing which depends upon them.

Find it no sur­prise, then, that the Son of the Most High Yahweh has said, “God is spirit, and those who wor­ship him must wor­ship in spirit and truth.” ((John 4:24, empha­sis mine.))

Lies cor­rupt every­thing they come in touch with, even some­thing as holy as wor­ship­ing Yahweh. Consequently, we must seek to expunge untruths, false­hoods, super­sti­tions, and folk­lore from our doc­trine and prac­tice. Misconceptions regard­ing Satan are no excep­tion, though he rev­els in our mis­un­der­stand­ing him, “for he is a liar and the father of lies.” ((John 8:44.))

I want to help clear the air of some of the mythos sur­round­ing Satan so that truth may pre­vail in our hearts and minds. The first issue I want to look at is whether Satan was the one called “Lucifer.”

Is Satan the one called “Lucifer”?

According to MarkBeast.com, “Lucifer was cre­ated by God as a per­fect angel. He was called Lucifer while he lived in heaven. After he sinned and per­sis­tently refused to repent he was thrown out of heaven. When Lucifer was cast out of heaven he lost his name Lucifer and he became known as Satan.” ((http://www.markbeast.com/satan/lucifer-satan-devil.htm)) This view seems fairly com­mon among Christians, but is it valid?

The name Lucifer can be found in cer­tain trans­la­tions of the Bible, such as the King James Version, in Isaiah 14:12. In more reli­able ver­sions, such as the English Standard Version, instead of “Lucifer,” we are given the epi­thet “Day Star” instead.

“How you are fallen from heaven, O Day Star, son of Dawn! How you are cut down to the ground, you who laid the nations low! ¹³You said in your heart, ‘I will ascend to heaven; above the stars of God I will set my throne on high; I will sit on the mount of assem­bly in the far reaches of the north; ¹⁴I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will make myself like the Most High.’ ¹⁵But you are brought down to Sheol, to the far reaches of the pit. ¹⁶Those who see you will stare at you and pon­der over you: ‘Is this the man who made the earth trem­ble, who shook king­doms, ¹⁷who made the world like a desert and over­threw its cities, who did not let his pris­on­ers go home?’ The Book of Isaiah 14:12 – 17

Where does that pas­sage men­tion Satan? Actually, that pas­sage picks up in the mid­dle of a larger pas­sage, a pas­sage which ear­lier makes it clear just who is being spo­ken of: “…you will take up this taunt against the king of Babylon.” ((Isaiah 14:4, empha­sis mine.))

A lit­tle over half of Isaiah 14 is this taunt against Babylon’s king, with no indi­ca­tion that the tar­get of the taunt ever changes.

So where do well-​​meaning Christians get the idea that at verse 12, the sub­ject of the taunt switches from the king of Babylon to Satan?

Quite hon­estly, I don’t know for sure. I can only assume ((And yes, I know what assum­ing gets me…)) that the idea comes from two pos­si­ble sources, assum­ing a bib­li­cal source for the notion:

The seventy-​​two returned with joy, say­ing, “Lord, even the demons are sub­ject to us in your name!” ¹⁸And he said to them, “I saw Satan fall like light­ning from heaven. The Gospel According to Luke 10:17 – 18

The logic must be that because Christ said He saw Satan fall from Heaven, then if a fall from Heaven is men­tioned within the Scriptures, it must refer to Satan’s fall. And so, such a fall is wedged into Isaiah 14, forc­ing a break in the rant con­cern­ing the king of Babylon.

However, if that is the case, and Isaiah 14 describes Satan’s fall, then we have a very inter­est­ing situation.

Now the ser­pent was more crafty than any other beast of the field that the Lord God had made. ((Genesis 3:1.))

From Genesis, we know that Satan was wicked; we know that he was present in the Garden with our first par­ents, tempt­ing them to dis­obey Yahweh. ((“Wait a minute,” you may say, “where does Genesis 3 refer to Satan?” Fair ques­tion. The open­ing of Revelation 20, quoted above, estab­lishes Satan as “that ancient ser­pent,” which is a fit­ting descrip­tion if he were truly in the Garden of Eden some six to ten thou­sand years ago.))

The prob­lem with those who would believe the pas­sage in Isaiah refers to Satan is this: How many humans were alive at the time Satan tempted Adam & Eve in the garden?

I’ll give you a hint: more than one, but less than three.

How many peo­ple had even existed up until that point? You guessed it: three.

But what does the pas­sage in Isaiah say? Whoever the Day Star was, he “laid the nations low”, ((Isaiah 14:12.)) “made the earth to trem­ble”, ((Isaiah 14:16.)) and “shook king­doms.” ((Ibid.)) He “over­threw [the world’s] cities, [and] did not let his pris­on­ers go home.” ((Isaiah 14:17.)) All of this the Day Star did in pride­ful antag­o­nism to Yahweh, as Isaiah 14:13 – 14 states, and for it he was cut down, cast into destruction.

If the Day Star was Satan, then when did he fall? It couldn’t have been any time prior to the events in the Garden of Eden, for there were no cities, king­doms, or peo­ple from which to take prisoners.

I sup­pose at this point, some peo­ple ((Yes, I’ve seen it hap­pen.)) will attempt to rec­on­cile the facts by claim­ing that a pre-​​adamic ((“Before Adam.”)) race of humans once existed which Satan Lucifer was granted to rule over, but he grew in pride until he rebelled against Yahweh, some­how caus­ing the destruc­tion of those most ancient of peoples.

Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned. ((Romans 5:12.))

Romans 5 should serve as the death knell for such an idea, that there were a race of humans before Adam which Lucifer ruled over. The fact of the mat­ter is that there was no death prior to Adam and that Adam’s respon­si­bil­ity — not the respon­si­bil­ity of name­less pre-​​adamic men — in bring­ing death into the world is tied insep­a­ra­bly to Jesus’ bring­ing redemption.

The Day Star could not have been Satan.

So because Satan was already wicked prior to there being king­doms and nations of men, the Day Star (read: Lucifer) could not have been Satan.

Secondly, I think peo­ple get the idea that the Day Star was Satan’s orig­i­nal name or descrip­tion from a pas­sage in Revelation:

Now war arose in heaven, Michael and his angels fight­ing against the dragon. And the dragon and his angels fought back, ⁸but he was defeated and there was no longer any place for them in heaven. ⁹And the great dragon was thrown down, that ancient ser­pent, who is called the devil and Satan, the deceiver of the whole world — he was thrown down to the earth, and his angels were thrown down with him. The Revelation of Jesus Christ 12:7 – 9

As above, the same sort of con­nec­tion is made: Here is a descrip­tion of Satan being cast down from Heaven, and so a link to Isaiah 14 is made to sup­port the pre­sump­tion that the Day Star, or Lucifer, was Satan.

A more care­ful exam­i­na­tion of this Revelation pas­sage, though, reveals that Satan was cast out of Heaven after the “male child” ((Revelation 12:5.)) was born. This was the birth of Jesus, the “one who is to rule all nations with a rod of iron, but was caught up to God and to his throne.” ((Ibid.))

Therefore, because Revelation describes Satan’s fall from Heaven at the hands of Michael & his angels as occur­ring after Jesus’ birth, it makes no sense for it to have been described as a past event in Isaiah 14.

Actually, what Revelation 12 describes is Satan’s final fall from Heaven, when he will no longer be per­mit­ted to accuse the brethren, just as he did Job thou­sands of years ago.

I dis­be­lieve that Satan was Isaiah’s “Day Star,” but I don’t find it hard to accept at all that Isaiah was describ­ing the actual king of Babylon. How often do human rulers fall into the pride­ful sin described by Isaiah? They lift up their eyes to the heav­ens and believe they can achieve any­thing, with­out God, bet­ter than God.

Humanity is amaz­ingly con­sis­tent: We see this behav­ior mak­ing its first huge step onto the scene at Shinar, when mankind got together and sought to build a tower to the heav­ens. ((Genesis 11:4.)) Because of the judg­ment of God upon the men of Shinar, the place became known as Babel, the begin­nings of Babylon. ((Genesis 11:9.))

And we see this behav­ior come to its cul­mi­na­tion in Revelation, where we learn that in the unspec­i­fied future, “Babylon the great, mother of pros­ti­tutes and of earth’s abom­i­na­tions” ((Revelation 17:5.)) meets its ulti­mate judg­ment: “Rejoice over her, O heaven, and you saints and apos­tles and prophets, for God has given judg­ment for you against her!” ((Revelation 18:20.))

§

I hope you’ll join me in refus­ing to call Satan “Lucifer,” and I hope you’ll be will­ing to cor­rect those who do so by point­ing out that “Lucifer” (or bet­ter, the “Day Star”) in Isaiah’s con­text refers not to Satan but to the king of Babylon in a taunt­ing, mock­ing manner.

There are a great deal of other ques­tions I’d like to take a look at regard­ing Satan. Was Satan ever an “anointed cherub”? What is Satan’s ori­gin? What is the leviathan? And more, I’m sure. If you want to be noti­fied when these are writ­ten, be sure to sub­scribe to my syn­di­ca­tion feed!