Mutually Exclusive Goals

Atheists & other ene­mies of God ((“Enemies of God” is used in the gener­i­cized sense that every­one who is not with Christ is against Him; the phrase is wholly bib­li­cal — James 4:4.)) often make light of the hypocrisy of so many Christians — myself cer­tainly included — for claim­ing that the Bible is “the Word of God” while ignor­ing so many of its com­mands. ((The Sermon on the Mount and the prac­ti­cal advice of the Book of James come to mind.))

Fair enough, but I won­der if those out­side of Jesus’ camp real­ize just how much more they’d hear the mes­sage of Jesus preached if every one of His fol­low­ers preached it as much as the Scriptures seem to call them. Paul, for exam­ple, faced intense per­se­cu­tion and was thrown out of cities after hav­ing been beaten for preach­ing, after which he picked him­self back up and went back into the town to preach some more!

If you want all Christians to prac­tice what they preach and to repent of their hypocrisy, then that is fan­tas­tic — every Christian should want that as well! But would the same unbe­liev­ers be happy with a world full of 1 bil­lion or so Paul the Apostles?

Not being hyp­o­crit­i­cal and liv­ing and let­ting live are mutu­ally exclu­sive goals.

This is the first entry in the new “Thoughts” cat­e­gory which will fea­ture mostly short posts on var­i­ous sub­jects that are more obser­va­tional or rhetor­i­cal in nature.

This entry was posted in Journal. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Mutually Exclusive Goals

  1. Brandon says:

    The conun­drum is more promi­nent I think (and hope) amongst merely reli­gious Christians, by which I mean those who do not have spir­i­tual evi­dence of new life in Christ.

    In The Problem of Pain C.S. Lewis offered three basic ele­ments of all good moral ‘reli­gions’ prop­erly called. The third was: “The moral­i­ties accepted among men may dif­fer [accord­ing to their reli­gious adher­ence]- though not, at bot­tom, so widely as is often claimed– but they all [said reli­gions] agree in pre­scrib­ing a behav­iour which their adher­ents fail to practise. ”

    To such agnos­tics it should be pointed out that sin is the cor­rupt nature of human­ity. Repenting of sin is the first com­mand of God for any­one today. It is also the hard­est. The Christian in repent­ing before God has swal­lowed the camel, while the athe­ist doubt by rea­son of our inabil­ity to down the gnat.

    The athe­ist exalts his own moral­ity, by liv­ing as scrip­ture pre­scribes Christians act and on this basis decries Christianity as vain. But let them repent before God. That is the first step of obe­di­ence towards God, and asso­ci­a­tion through bap­tism is the second.

    Latest from Brandon: Overcoming: The Craving

  2. Rick Beckman says:

    It is also the hard­est,” you say, and rightly so, for it is only through the “killing of self” that we are able to repent. Only when we see our­selves as empty, utterly lack­ing of any right­eous­ness which God would accept. It is only the real­iza­tion that it is not us but Christ which can save us that can drive us to repent, to cast off our for­mer deeds — both our bla­tant sins and our filthy right­eous­nesses — in des­per­ate depen­dence upon He who has died and risen again on our behalf.

    Man is a proud crea­ture, and it is that pride which keeps so many from repent­ing. After all, who needs Christ when one can be a “good per­son” and get to Heaven that way? Who needs a slain & res­ur­rected Savior when one has a “good deed for the day”? It is such pride which must be destroyed for it is at enmity with the Creator.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>