Now CommentLuv Enabled

Flamingo Love

In order to give some­thing back to those who take the time to leave com­ments here, I’ve installed the bril­liant lit­tle plu­gin CommentLuv.

What does this mean for you? Well, unless you are a blog­ger or have some other web­site which pro­duces a syn­di­ca­tion feed, noth­ing (sorry).

However, if you are the proud owner of a site (such as a blog) which makes avail­able your lat­est posts via a syn­di­ca­tion feed, then you will gain a com­pletely free deep link ((A link to an indi­vid­ual page of your site, rather than sim­ply to your home page.)) to your site!

The CommentLuv plu­gin will do its best to auto-​​discover your feed based upon the address sub­mit­ted in the form while com­ment­ing; how­ever, if you want to ensure that your feed is dis­cov­ered, you can include it man­u­ally within your com­ment. Example:

This is an exam­ple com­ment. It will con­tain qual­ity feed­back and not lame “First post!” non­sense or other rub­bish. ((Why will it be a qual­ity com­ment? Because my read­ers rock, that’s why!)) And so on. And so on. But I also want to make sure CommentLuv can find my feed, so I’m going to add this to my com­ment: [feed]http://www.example.com/feed/[/feed]

That’s it! The magic is in the [feed] tag; sim­ply enclose the address to your feed in those tags, and CommentLuv will attempt to dis­cover your lat­est entry based upon it.

And if all goes well, your com­ment will be posted, with the added bonus of includ­ing a nice, shiny link back to a page on your site. Delightful, no?

I still reserve the right to delete com­ments if they look sus­pi­ciously spammy. Having a huge num­ber of com­ments means noth­ing to me if the qual­ity of the com­ments is poor — and I cer­tainly don’t want to risk being flagged by Google because of spam-​​ish com­ments. So, just use your head when you com­ment, and you’ll be fine.

And enjoy the extra back­links to your site! :-)

(And if you want to see CommentLuv in action, the first reader to ben­e­fit from it was Gordan com­ment­ing on my Genesis 1:4 post!)

This entry was posted in Journal. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Now CommentLuv Enabled

  1. Brandon says:

    Why will it be a qual­ity com­ment? Because my read­ers rock, that’s why!
    Go on. Deny every vice of human lazi­ness, ignore that it’s cou­pled with the Internet. Continue to believe in the abil­ity of your read­ers to pro­duce intel­li­gent com­ments. :P

    Umm. Do these back-​​links pro­duce a link to a rel­e­vant page on the site? Or just ‘lat­est from?’. Will enclos­ing a link to a rel­e­vant page on our site in the feed tags pro­duce the same thing? Or does that become spam?

  2. Michael says:

    Hi Rick,

    Michael from Germany here.

    Thums up. I sim­ply love CommentLuv ..*-)

    Oh, and great theme …*-)

    I use it myself on two blogs. On one i replace the rotat­ing head­ers with a video wall.

    For the other one i still look for some pho­tos or pics with the right size to use. Where did you find yours? They look real nice

    Keep the good work up …*-)

    Michael

    Latest from Michael: Full or Partial Feeds? Or Headlines only?

  3. Rick Beckman says:

    Michael — Thanks for stop­ping by Kingdom Front! To answer your ques­tion, I’m using cropped por­tions of wall­pa­pers made by the incom­pa­ra­ble Vladstudio, with his permission.

    Also, I should point out that you are using FeedBurner’s link track­ing tool (or click track­ing or what­ever it is); the link to your con­tent that CommentLuv see is a FeedBurner redi­rect link — users click­ing the link will arrive at your con­tent, but search engines may very well credit the link to FeedBurner rather than to your con­tent. For more info, check out “Turn off FeedBurner Redirects in RSS Feeds from shankri-​​la.

    Brandon — My read­ers (at least the ones I can rule out as being scripted bots) haven’t let me down yet. ;-)

    CommentLuv only returns a link to the lat­est post on a site — see the pre­vi­ous com­ment by Michael, for exam­ple. The [feed] tags will only work with links to an RSS feed. That, of course, means that if only one cat­e­gory of a blog is rel­e­vant to this site, you could include that category’s feed, for exam­ple [feed]http://example.com/category/theology/feed/[/feed].

    I sup­pose it is pos­si­ble that if a post fills up with dozens or hun­dreds of com­ments (’cause that hap­pens so often around here!), the vari­ety of likely irrel­e­vant links may dilute the author­ity of this page in search engines… but, I’m not ter­ri­bly wor­ried about such things, and the ben­e­fit to my read­ers out­weighs any con­se­quences on my part.

  4. Brandon says:

    I see. That is really quite cool, and actu­ally rather gen­er­ous and self-​​sacrificing as well. /​me applauds. Now to try this again… maybe this time I will get it right. :P Do I actu­ally have to type in ‘lat­est from me’ when using the feed tags or is that pro­vided by CommentLuv?

    Latest from Brandon: Overcoming: The Craving

  5. Thanks for writ­ing your review on com­mentluv. this looks like a really cool tool!

    Latest from King Vanlines: Picking a Washington Moving Company

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>