Posts tagged as:

energy

Genesis 1:5

by Rick on March 24, 2008

Night and Day

God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And there was evening and there was morning, the first day. Genesis 1:5

God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night.

The impression I get from the Scriptures is that names are of particular importance to God. They often carried a particular meaning, a meaning which should not be ignored when studying the Bible. Perhaps most notable was that the Messiah was called “Emmanuel,” meaning “God with us” — no more concise description of the Incarnation could be given than Emmanuel! Likewise, even the Messiah’s given name, Jesus, was the Greek counterpart to “Joshua,” meaning “salvation of the Lord.” No more apt name could have been given the Savior!

Whether renaming Abram to Abraham or Simon to Peter, the Lord makes a point of the names of things.1 And He here names the “light” and the “dark” (which were separated from one another in the previous verse).

To the light the Creator gave the name “Day.” The word is possibly derived from a root meaning “warm,” which makes sense enough; but the word itself? Well, no surprises, but it means “day.”

The darkness he called “Night,” and while that name also doesn’t carry any sort of special meaning, I found interesting what Strong’s Concordance said about the word. It states that the Hebrew word used for “Night” here comes from another word which means “to fold back,” and it says that the word for night properly means “to twist (away of the light).”

Isn’t that interesting? The Night — the darkness which God separated from the light — can no longer mingle with the light. It’s nature is wholly different. To the ancients, the darkness twists and writhes away from the light; nowadays we know that “darkness” isn’t a thing in and of itself but is instead the absence of light.

I think that modern knowledge helps us to understand the nature of light & dark in the Scriptures. It’s obvious enough what happens at night — due to the earth’s rotation, the sun’s light is no longer able to fall upon the “night” portion of the planet.

But light & dark are much deeper than that. Read with me a portion of the Gospel of John:

And this is the judgment: the light has come into the world, and people loved the darkness rather than the light because their deeds were evil. 20For everyone who does wicked things hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his deeds should be exposed. 21But whoever does what is true comes to the light, so that it may be clearly seen that his deeds have been carried out in God. John 3:19-21

Can you see it there? Even within man darkness hates light — it twists away from it, seeks to suppress it, does whatever it can so that its evil will not be exposed. Do you ever wonder why unbelievers despise our Savior? Do you ever wonder why the world seeks to silence Christians and the Gospel to which they bear witness?

It is because where the light is, darkness cannot exist. In nature, that works fine — day & night exist harmoniously. Within man, however, light & dark will forever be at enmity; they simply cannot coexist!

Before we move on to the next part of this verse, it is important that it be noted that by naming the light “Day” and the darkness “Night,” God provides us with very simple definitions which we must not forget as we progress through the chapter.

And there was evening and there was morning, the first day.

The first day of Time has come to pass. What took place?

  • The Father created the formless Earth & the heavens.
  • The Spirit imparted energy to the watery deep.
  • The Son (read: the Word) spoke light into existence.
  • God separated light from darkness.
  • God named the Day & Night.

And that first day wrapped up. During the night, God did not act creatively. In so doing, He was setting up a pattern for who would eventually be His people — work during the day, for the night comes when no man shall work.2

There are many who would make the claim that what is in view here is not a literal 24-hour day, but is instead an indeterminate period of time. This claim is generally made in order to validate the Scriptures in lieu of scientific theory. Fair enough, though it should be noted that is a very pour way to interpret the Scriptures!

Keep in mind that God has already defined for us what the “Day” is — it is when the light is shining! How often does the light of the sun shine on any one point on the planet? Well, it varies depending on where you are, but you’re certainly not going to fit geological ages into those periods of light.

No, these were your typical 24-hour days — complete with mornings and evenings.

It is morning now in this creation account, and we’re ready for the second day to begin and for the second account of the Lord speaking. Stay tuned for verse 6!

Unless otherwise noted, all Scriptures quoted within this post come from the English Standard Version of the Holy Bible.

Popularity: 8%

  1. For those interested, if you convert my full name to what it means, you get “Great Leader - Clergyman - Barrel-maker - Junior.” []
  2. Times were very different before the harnessing of electricity! []

{ 9 comments }

Fact #15: Chuck Norris CAN Divide by Zero

If you had asked me about 0 (zero) prior to reading Zero: The Biography of a Dangerous Idea, the answer I could have given wouldn’t have been too interesting. After all, as far as I was concerned, zero was simply the lack of something, the number between the whole numbers -1 and 1… I may have mentioned that 0 was also capable of making calculators complain; Windows Calculator, for instance, when fed 1/0 returns Cannot divide by zero., which is more than most hand-held calculators I’ve used return!

However, something I realized several years ago is that a calculator is being dishonest by saying you cannot divide by 0; indeed, you can, but the answer is as difficult to fathom as 0 itself: ∞ (infinity). The online calculators of Calculator.com reflect that when you attempt to divide 1 (or anything else) by 0.

Zero reaffirmed that thought, and it added unto it a wealth of history and knowledge about that seemingly innocuous number.

The journey spanned from ancient history, visiting with men like Aristotle and Pythagoras down through time to Newton, Einstein, and Hubble.

The author, Charles Seife, entertainingly paints the plight faced by mathematicians, scientists, and philosophers of the ages when they have had to go toe to toe with zero.

Though I don’t mean to say the book is wholly accessible. I’d be lying if I said I understood everything Seife wrote; indeed, anyone with even a rudimentary understanding of calculus would do better at grasping some of the concepts in Zero than I would.

The advanced mathematics discussion wasn’t what made the book enjoyable throughout, however; what I particularly liked was Seife’s dealings with the question of God. He didn’t skirt the issue, but neither did he exclaim that 0 (or anything else) was the death knell of God (or the concept thereof).

And though Seife does explain that the universe begins and ends with 0 (rather than the God of the Bible), he does provide a very positive nod to belief in God in his discussion of Pascal’s Wager.

Seife explained, Just as he analyzed the value–or expectation–of a gamble, Pascal analyzed the value of accepting Christ as savior. Thanks to the mathematics of zero and infinity, Pascal concluded that one should assume God exists (p. 101).

Note that Pascal’s Wager is not a proof of God; it cannot be. However, when given the choice between belief in God or un- or disbelief in God, Pascal determined that there is infinite gain in believing and infinite gain in disbelieving.

Pascal’s Wager holds true even if there is only a 1 in 1,000,000,000,000,000 chance that God exists; it is still a better bet, so to speak, to believe in God. The magic of zero and infinity makes it so. Actually, the time when it is not better to believe in God is when there is a 0 chance that He exists, and frankly, no one will ever be able to make that conclusion — the scientific method is powerless against things which are, well, by definition outside the realm of natural phenomena, which a transcendent being certainly would be.

Seife sums it up best on page 104:

If there is no chance that God exists, Pascal’s wager — as it came to be known — makes no sense. The expected value of being a Christian would then be 0 × ∞, and that was gibberish. Nobody was willing to say that there was zero chance that God exists. No matter what your outlook, it is always better to believe in God, thanks to the magic of zero and infinity. Certainly Pascal knew which way to wager, even though he gave up mathematics to win his bet.

Don’t let that trip you up, though; Zero is not a treatise on theology or the viability of God-belief, and continuing on through the book, we find that Seife seems to accept that the universe will one day die a heat death — a total freeze as the cosmos expand forever, all energy being expended, all stars having collapsed:

The expansion of the universe isn’t slowing down. It might even be speeding up. … The fate of our universe will not be a big crunch but an eternal expansion, cooling, and heat death … The universe will die a cold death, not a hot one. The answer is ice, not fire, thanks to the power of zero.

I hope that most of my readers would look at that and think, Nonsense! Revelation says… And certainly I agree with your faith in Revelation; however, let’s not discount the scientific explanation given above…

An infinitely expanding universe, with everything moving farther away from everything else, filled with no more suns…

Stay with me here:

  • Revelation 20:11 states that the earth and heaven (the universe) is fleeing away — it is moving away.
  • Revelation 21:1 states that the first heaven and Earth (the universe) passes away, a phrase which seems to mean both cast aside and perished.
  • Revelation 22:5 states that there will no longer be the light of the sun there — God Himself will be the light.

It’s somewhat a stretch, sure, but it’s pretty amazing that the Apostle John knew all that way back when, ages before Newton’s gravity, Einstein’s relativity, and Hubble’s expansion. And I’m thankful to Seife for this little bit of confirmation of Scripture, as strange of a confirmation as it is!

Zero is a great read, a little thick at times, a lot of fun at others (did you know that using the power of 0, you can show that 1=2 and that Winston Churchill is a carrot?). I recommend it to anyone who thinks they are a geek, especially a math geek, but also to anyone curious about the universe in which we live. Truly, 0 is at the heart of it — a fitting touch to a cosmos created by He who is Infinite.

Buy Zero: Biography of a Dangerous Idea at Amazon.com

Popularity: 3%

{ 0 comments }

Earth Hour 2008

by Rick on January 27, 2008

Sydney Opera House

Almost one year ago, the city of Sydney, Australia, did something unprecedented: thousands of businesses and individuals flipped the off switch — lights, televisions, and more were switched off for sixty minutes.

And for one hour, Sydney’s power consumption was cut by just over 10%, the equivalent of taking 48,000 cars off of the road for one hour.

This year, Earth Hour is going global, with corporations and individuals from all around the world joining in.

The goal of this, of course, is to cause a dramatic decrease in the amount of energy expended and in the amount of pollutants released. That in itself is great, but if you don’t buy into environmentalism, there are other reasons to flip the off switches in your home.

Instead of watching television, break out the board games and bring your family together for a game of Sorry! or Clue. Instead of surfing the Internet, read a novel by candlelight, perhaps rediscovering an old favorite.

By participating, you will be doing A Good Thing; I promise you that.

All of that said, the reason why I’m writing here isn’t so much to encourage you to participate — although, that would be great! No, instead I want to encourage you to encourage Wal-Mart to participate!

Over the past year especially, Wal-Mart has been making much of its environmental policies, with goals as lofty as producing zero waste.

Is Wal-Mart doing everything it can? I won’t pass that judgment here, but I will say that Earth Hour would give Wal-Mart the chance to put its environmental ethics where its wallet is. Can this retail goliath shut down for one hour? With well over 3,000 stores in the United States alone, Wal-Mart would be able to set a national example which would be extremely difficult to ignore.

In the hour they’re shut down (or at the very least running on half [nighttime] lighting on a limited number of registers, but that wouldn’t be nearly as impressive)? It would provide the perfect opportunity to educate those who show up — sharing with them environmental facts as well as simple ways that they too can make a positive impact on the environment.

So if you would, let Wal-Mart know what you think about this! Here’s an example of what you could write to them:

I know that the company wants to “lead the way,” so to speak, concerning our environment going into the future, setting the standard for other companies to follow.

In light of that, I am encouraging Wal-Mart Stores to endorse and participate in Earth Hour 2008 (earthhour.org).

In the evening of March 29, 2008, the Earth Hour initiative is calling on businesses, individuals, organizations, and schools to turn it off.

Everything possible — turned off for one hour.

If Wal-Mart were to do this at all of its stores, the impact would be huge. If other companies followed suit, the effect multiplies quickly!

This is a perfect opportunity for Wal-Mart to show that it is willing to do what it can to encourage environmental awareness and stewardship.

Thank you for your time.

Chief Executive Lee Scott of Wal-Mart has said, “As one of the largest companies in the world, with an expanding global presence, environmental problems are our problems.”

By participating in Earth Hour, Wal-Mart will be able to make a huge impact while setting a global example for others to follow.

Popularity: 4%

{ 0 comments }

Links of Interest for Today

by Rick on November 21, 2007

I apologize — work has been occupying a great deal of my energy this past week, and I haven’t been able to devote much thought into enriching the blogosphere with scriptural insights and general witticism. Maybe soon. Maybe later. I don’t know.

Regardless of that, though, I have been keeping up on reading others’ blogs (’cause others rock!), and here are some links for you to enjoy the same, if you wish:

  • Third Annual Reminder: Boycott “Turkey Day” — No, this isn’t a call to boycott Thanksgiving; rather, it is a plea to Christians to avoid calling it “Turkey Day” and to embrace thankfulness as a necessary and overflowing part of life. If anything, visit for the great Spurgeon quote on ungratefulness!
  • Why Not Speed? (pt. 2) — Ms. Kiley gives her second and third reasons for obedience to the speed limit laws, and I find them to be good insights which aren’t often expressed nowadays, which is a shame. Watching that speedometer is definitely something I need more often to do…
  • The Theology of Employment — Work is a theological issue, and it has been since the beginning of man’s time on Earth. Joshua Hitchcock shares with us from the Scriptures why it is. Never forget 2 Thessalonians 3:10; if men are able to work but are unwilling to, they do not deserve to eat. Read through the comments as well for more insights; find out why you can and should be joyful (and unceasingly thankful) for your job!
  • I’ll conclude with a bit of shamelessness… My loverly wife has nominated my blog for “Best Religion Blog” in the Bloggers’ Choice Awards; would you mind taking a moment and voting for me? I would really appreciate it! And while you’re at it, stop on over at my wife’s site and then vote for her in the Best Photography Blog category!

Popularity: 5%

{ 3 comments }